Home
Pirates of the Burley Griffin
A schedule bears the same relationship to reality as Astrology.
On Board 
29th-Jun-2008 04:28 pm - Indiana Jones & the etc
Arcadia

Finally got round to seeing this quite enjoyable film. Mind you I was firmly in a "relaxing on a Sunday afternoon" groove so I probably would have enjoyed almost anything...

Don't expect a review. :)

19th-Apr-2008 03:40 pm - Oh Glorious!
Arcadia
I've signed up for the forum attached to John Scalzi's Whatever blog and it has a discussion of the (un)Intelligent Design movie Expelled.

The New York Times review is one of the funniest things I've read in a long while if only for the rating notice at the end:

"Expelled” is rated PG (Parental guidance suggested). It has smoking guns and drunken logic."

If this thing should ever get released here, I'm tempted to review it as a comedy. Of errors if nothing else. :)
17th-Feb-2008 10:18 pm - Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
Arcadia

Musical junkie that I am I really wanted to enjoy this but I found it to be more impressive than enjoyable.

Certainly the staging, the costuming, the lighting were superb in that inimitable and undefinable Tim Burton style. I enjoyed the performances of the cast, the songs were appropriate if not particularly memorable.

But...something didn't quite work for me. I don't know if it was the subject matter or something else but I don't particularly want to see this again. Nor, unlike Rent, am I particularly interested in seeing a live performance.

9th-Dec-2007 11:10 pm - Snarky Observations from the weekend
Arcadia
Does anyone remember this 100 Days post by [info]dalekboy? Its about the evils of DVD marketing, in particular versions and extras. Well I've just encountered a nasty example of the breed, one sure to infuriate [info]angriest and any other West Wing fans reading this. I was always slightly irritated by the fact that the West Wing DVDs that I was borrowing didn't have any extras at all.

None. Zero. Nada. Zip.

I just bought the complete box which contains a double disc of extras, a printed script of the pilot and a little episode guide booklet so you can look up the synopsis of an episode without removing the first or last disc of a season from its case. If I'd bought the individual seasons and then discovered this...

Oh, and I just saw a poster for a live action Disney movie (Enchanted I think) featuring a CGI furry mascot who no doubt will wisecrack all through the movie just like the ones in the animated movies. My immediate reaction? At last the real reason for Disney buying Pixar is revealed!
17th-Aug-2007 08:16 pm - That only works once...
Arcadia

To get started the plot for 28 Days Later depends on a group of animal rights activists who are, frankly, evidence of evolution in action. 

This irritated me at the time that I saw 28 Days Later, but I got over it and enjoyed the rest of the film.

But it is a plot device that, for me at least, only works once. Unfortunately Black Sheep uses it too so I walked out about half an hour in - it completely shattered the suspension of disbelief for me.

Sigh.

27th-Jul-2007 10:02 pm - Tales from Earthsea
Arcadia
I wanted to like this movie but for the first time since Pom Poko a Studio Ghibli film has left me cold.

To be fair this is at least partly due to some technical issues with the print I saw - panning shots were incredibly jerky, enough so to completely ruin the beauty of the backgrounds and often the suspension of disbelief.

However there was also something else that was missing. Some sense of heart or soul to the film that I just didn't connect to.

In terms of the adaptation from the novels it was mostly drawn from The Farthest Shore and Tehanu, and in many of the essential aspects of the world building was closer to the novels than I'd hoped for. The story... less so.

Its a pretty enough to watch (when its not jerking all over the place), and I'd like to see a smoother copy, but overall no better than average.



25th-Jul-2007 09:41 pm - Less than meets the eye.
Arcadia

As you may have guessed from the title I saw Transformers this evening.

As a colleague at work noted this is a movie aimed at 11 year old boys. Judging by some of the costumes they had the female lead (almost) wearing I'd move the target more towards 13 year olds.

It is also a blatant recruiting film for the US military (although I note with some amusement that the product placement adviser beat out the military advisor in the credits. Just).

But having said that, there are some refreshing elements to this movie. The female lead Mikaela Barnes (played by Megan Fox) is skilled, intelligent, loyal, and courageous (a word I chose very carefully, she has her moment of fear but faces it and conquers it).

Given the target audience, I think that this is at least slightly subversive scripting and I thoroughly approve.

As for the male lead Sam Witwicky (played by Shia LaBeouf) ? Well to quote the friend I saw it with, he achieves acceptable levels of mediocrity by the end and does get a few things right. 

Bad, but watchably so on an $8 ticket. I wouldn't have paid more.

I'm still undecided as to whether this will eventually qualify for the ranks of the gloriously bad.

16th-Jul-2007 10:05 pm - Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Arcadia

This is a spoiler free review. Its more about impressions than the storyline.

And the 1st impression is one of tight, disciplined editing. There is nothing extraneous in the storyline; all shotguns on the mantlepiece are used and don't usually get much time to gather dust whilst they're waiting to be fired.

The 2nd impression is that the tight editing vastly improves the character development, and enhances the general "War on Terror" atmosphere of the story.

All in all, a very impressive piece of work. 

EDIT: A couple of amusing items in the end credits (alas no easter eggs, sys admins, or business analysts):
a) Drapesmasters. What the...?
b) Wand Combat Choreographers

(Note the plural in both cases)

This page was loaded Jul 7th 2008, 2:49 pm GMT.